bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardVMware, VBSA
Memory1.5 GB free of 5.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 15:20
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Apple Part 000 r0p0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 61.1
33% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 85.6
8-Core 80
11% 82.8 Pts
64-Core 88.7
6% 88.7 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0406) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.6.4
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.4% Below average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 275
46% 124 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 26.5
21% 25.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 69GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,618
Write 2,490
Mixed 1,696
504% 2268 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 33.9
136% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 408
309% 413 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB 5GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 1024, 512 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 30.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 24
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 13% 52 103 59 60 0" 1920 1009 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback