To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory41.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 09:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 44.2
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 49.7
30% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 62.6
8-Core 102
10% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Asus(1043 0591) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 74.4
44% 62 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 43.5
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 568 423 419 422 423 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,260
Write 1,336
Mixed 1,094
SusWrite 446
232% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 29.5
98% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 140
113% 162 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 116%
Great: 253%
OUBASIKII 128GB
88GB free
Firmware: 2109XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 401 405 398 409 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 952
Write 404
Mixed 478
SusWrite 401
124% 559 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 16.2
76% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 227
162% 209 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 M393B2G70QH0- 48GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 16.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 2560 1369 IOD2105 LCD-MQ321XD
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback