Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 297%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory247.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 19:23
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 1,009
88% 749 Pts
64-Core 5597
346% 5597 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 262
Parallax 272
230% 272 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 244
Splatting 189
208% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 198%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1223
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3415 3535 3532 3507 3463 3558 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 4 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7877 7861 7882 7887 8339 8592 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
805% Outstanding
Read 4,330
Write 5,696
Mixed 4,356
SusWrite 8,073
1,276% 5,614 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 81
315% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 880
684% 933 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 805%
Great: 805%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6409 6388 6287 6405 6414 6412 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
667% Outstanding
Read 3,710
Write 6,324
Mixed 3,001
SusWrite 6386
1,103% 4,855 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 78
274% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 985
DQ Mixed 964
731% 981 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 667%
Great: 305%
Amd-raid Array 1 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 186 181 183 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 129
Write 169
Mixed 169
SusWrite 183
121% 163 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.7
1,120% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
245% Outstanding
MC Read 110
MC Write 71.4
MC Mixed 122
289% 101 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 41.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 245%
Great: 378%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 7.2" 1360 705 SAM065F SAMSUNG
Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI II Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 339%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 582%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback