Asus Pro WS X299 SAGE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS X299 SAGE II  (all builds)
Memory249.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 14:07
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 131
2-Core 251
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 942
86% 720 Pts
64-Core 2,319
144% 2,319 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 286
Parallax 335
237% 304 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 252
Splatting 186
206% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 225%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$75
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 433 443 446 409 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 451
Mixed 412
SusWrite 428
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 43.8
156% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 303
242% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 37.3
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 9.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 378%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS X299 SAGE II Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS X299 SAGE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $2,193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback