Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T3300KA
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220222
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 11:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 37.6
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 96.3
35% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 120
18% 128 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D02) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 4.7
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PDP3128B-AB 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 116 87 104 92 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 339
Write 125
Mixed 181
SusWrite 100
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 9
33% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 128
99% 137 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 32 5 60 13.3" 1280 720 SDC4169
Typical Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Slate T3300KA_T3300KA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback