Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X  (all builds)
Memory37.7 GB free of 48 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '24 at 06:19
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$449
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 210
2-Core 402
118% 229 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,581
143% 1,201 Pts
64-Core 2,763
171% 2,763 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.44
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
8.32% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 13.5
6% 11.7 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 22.1
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.32%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,541
Write 2,888
Mixed 2,762
612% 2,731 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.3
247% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,689
DQ Write 1232
DQ Mixed 1,446
1,085% 1,456 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-7200J3646F24G 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
238% Outstanding
MC Read 165
MC Write 52
MC Mixed 65.7
269% 94.2 GB/s
SC Read 40.6
SC Write 53.9
SC Mixed 49.8
137% 48.1 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 238%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3CD5 MAG 275CQRXF
Typical GA-X670E AORUS PRO X Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback