Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive416% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsrock X670E Steel Legend  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Steel Legend
Memory31.1 GB free of 48 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 21:51
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$182
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 70.1
1-Core 180
2-Core 341
103% 197 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 962
96% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 63.9
54% 66.3 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 65
Splatting 62.6
52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3086 3306 3326 3320 3250 3210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 1,971
Write 3,267
Mixed 2,545
SusWrite 3,250
628% 2,758 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 77.7
258% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 1,209
DQ Mixed 1,348
1,000% 1,323 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 416%
Great: 587%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 17.2
Mixed 30.6
54% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
63% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-7200J3646F24G 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 54.7
MC Write 54.7
MC Mixed 56.4
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 43.4
SC Write 58.6
SC Mixed 47.4
142% 49.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 151%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F 27GL850
Typical X670E Steel Legend Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback