Today's hottest deals

Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 02:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 258
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 822
79% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,304
81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.3% Very good
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 122
Parallax 152
76% 123 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 110
Splatting 75.6
74% 92.1 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 811 370 321 283 317 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1574
Write 1,732
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 576
290% 1,294 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 65.3
231% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 938
706% 953 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 212%
Great: 276%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 179 174 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 166
Mixed 116
SusWrite 177
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 106%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
882GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 28 35 32 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 12.7
Write 75.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 32.4
32% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 13%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 25.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 21.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 56% 9 215 58 60 27" 1280 720 SPT0AB8 Sceptre L27
Typical B550 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback