Atcomputers COMFOR OFFICE MINI

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Atcomputers COMFOR OFFICE MINI (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte N3050ND2P
Memory	3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 05:26
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 47.2 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 42.4 25% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 42.2 8-Core 42.1 6% 42.2 Pts	64-Core 42.7 3% 42.7 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4234 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 2.38 1% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4637646 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 72438918421713 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 75 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 46 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 21 39 73016999957 (C2) HDA temperature 21 39 73016999957 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4637646 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4637646 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4637646 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 68719476736 (E9) Unknown 0 0 216 (EA) Unknown 0 0 79 (F1) Unknown 0 0 79 (F2) Unknown 0 0 175 (F4) Unknown 100 100 458753	43.5% Average	Read 433 Write 131 Mixed 201 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 10.1 55% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 61.8 DQ Write 34.2 DQ Mixed 22.2 24% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 73%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 5.76 Mixed 4.13 10% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.36 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 22% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-011.A00LF 1x4GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 5.7 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Atcomputers COMFOR OFFICE MINI

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)