PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150818 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 11 '18 at 10:36 |
Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0909 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
68.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 171x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 138x |
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 88x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 72x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 62x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $142 |