Today's hottest deals

Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220422
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 14:44
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 114
50% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 271
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 147
Parallax 116
105% 131 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 100
Splatting 86.8
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 850 Lite 500GB
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0922A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1072 996 1090 1063 1083 1092 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,059
Write 1,102
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 1,066
242% 1,071 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 49.7
163% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 366
268% 355 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 174%
Great: 383%
Hs-ssd-e100 1024G 1TB
321GB free
Firmware: AA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 218 132 62 62 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 244
Write 231
Mixed 228
SusWrite 127
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 26.8
93% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 149
115% 155 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 105 105 102 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49% Average
Read 66
Write 89.2
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 104
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49%
Great: 66%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
95GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 87.5
Write 75.1
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 84.4
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
490GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 103 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 102
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPER FRAME 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.7% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 50 60 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0F91 LC24RG50
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback