Gmktec M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGmktec M4  (all builds)
MotherboardGMKtec GMKtec
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230914
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 21:56
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 67.9
1-Core 166
2-Core 324
97% 186 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 975
97% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,208
75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0301 02F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4644
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 9.3
6% 9.43 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 8.1
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e1000 1024G 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HS10726
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,917
Write 1,962
Mixed 1,877
429% 1,919 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 56.3
187% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1050
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 729
566% 787 MB/s
Poor: 117% Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26.6
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 16.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 30 49.5" 1280 720 VIZ1033 V405-G9
Typical M4 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Gmktec M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback