Micro Neptune series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive424% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro Neptune series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen AHBAA
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 23:52
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 203
2-Core 396
118% 227 Pts
4-Core 709
8-Core 1238
118% 974 Pts
64-Core 1,908
118% 1,908 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 31.7
21% 29.2 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.63 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 512GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3302 3328 3119 361 359 361 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 2,578
Write 3,353
Mixed 2,222
SusWrite 1,805
562% 2,489 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 367
4K Mixed 122
470% 189 MB/s
DQ Read 1,778
DQ Write 1,231
DQ Mixed 1,528
1,134% 1,512 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 424%
Great: 399%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 37.6
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 30.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC211 PHL 221V8
Typical Neptune series Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Micro Neptune series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback