Today's hottest deals

HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 11:06
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 500
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 55
Parallax 72.5
47% 61.7 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 38.1
42% 53.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aoluska A6-256G 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP10492P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 384 387 397 403 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 430
Write 400
Mixed 345
SusWrite 393
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 11.2
84% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 15.9
70% 153 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston HP698650-154-HYAG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 9.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 29.5" 1280 720 XMIA010 Mi 30 HFCW
Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback