Lenovo 82XQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82XQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime19.6 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 20:17
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 35.6
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 163
50% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 400
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Legend(17AA 3C39) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.45
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 11
5% 9.33 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GEJ4X112N 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 389 272 271 157 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 397
Write 348
Mixed 395
SusWrite 252
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 15.1
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 303
209% 267 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9052
Typical 82XQ Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82XQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback