Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82QD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82QD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 05:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 64.1
1-Core 169
2-Core 328
97% 187 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 816
84% 675 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B3A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 13.4
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 12.5
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GEJ4X112N 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51040C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 1097 1079 1499 1275 556 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,735
Mixed 1,435
SusWrite 1,095
328% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 37.1
180% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 587
402% 505 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 203%
Great: 231%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A1G16TB-062E:F 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08C2
Typical 82QD Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82QD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback