Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '24 at 21:38
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 681
72% 575 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 78.3
48% 64.8 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 42.3
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GEJ4X112N 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1977 1997 1806 478 127 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,838
Write 1,892
Mixed 1,727
SusWrite 1,138
371% 1,649 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 40.1
190% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 916
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 764
555% 730 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 231%
Great: 231%
SSD 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 165 54 55 55 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 313
Write 265
Mixed 250
SusWrite 108
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 30.5
128% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 163
141% 204 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
891GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 124 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 120
Write 134
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 127
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 132% - Outstanding Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback