Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HF
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 21:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-11260H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 153
2-Core 285
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 842
86% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3098) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5445
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 5.5
4% 6.73 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.3
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1617 1603 1196 328 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,794
Write 1,590
Mixed 1,435
SusWrite 816
316% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 41.9
280% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 1013
DQ Mixed 805
647% 903 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 245%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FT 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 29.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 17.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 144 17.3" 1920 1009 AUODDA7 B173HAN04.9
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF_FX706HF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback