Micro V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro V3  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen HPPAC
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240410
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 18:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 52.6
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 148
52% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 454
42% 349 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Device(1F4C E001) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.8% Below average
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 55.8
27% 39.4 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 65.9
39% 44.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,292
Write 1094
Mixed 1,126
261% 1,171 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 34.1
112% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 507
347% 441 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 37.3
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 34
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 30 165 14" 1280 720 BOE0B7B
Typical V3 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Micro V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback