Micro V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro V3  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen HPPAC
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '24 at 02:43
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 33.1
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 141
45% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 442
41% 344 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Device(1F4C E001) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 45.2
28% 34.7 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 64.6
35% 39.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 872
Write 1,191
Mixed 1,043
233% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 31
104% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 511
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 495
322% 386 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 37.6
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 35.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 47 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0AD6
Typical V3 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Micro V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback