Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H270M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 04:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 239
36% 259 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6167) 3GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (64 fps cap detected)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 56.3
53% 62.2 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 64
50% 60.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_P400e-MTFDDAK050MAR 50GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0152 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
Read 424
Write 105
Mixed 157
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 5.69
77% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 7.36
29% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%
Dell USB Portable HDD 1TB
531GB free
Firmware: 040D
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 89.6
Write 87.7
Mixed 75.4
63% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FBD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback