Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 262%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 258%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 12:12
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$190
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 204
2-Core 380
115% 220 Pts
4-Core 756
8-Core 1,253
122% 1,004 Pts
64-Core 1,491
92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 109%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$750
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 363
Reflection 347
Parallax 371
296% 360 fps
MRender 484
Gravity 302
Splatting 217
260% 334 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 247%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613200WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1171 623 718 621 276 538 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 3,029
Write 3,852
Mixed 2,764
SusWrite 658
579% 2,576 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 79.4
274% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2,084
DQ Write 1,770
DQ Mixed 1,904
1,433% 1,919 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 331%
Great: 494%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$120
664GB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1254 1277 1279 1278 1282 1229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,390
Write 1,297
Mixed 1,268
SusWrite 1,267
294% 1,305 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 77.1
245% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,530
DQ Write 1,427
DQ Mixed 1,710
1,220% 1,555 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 275%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
144% Outstanding
MC Read 51.2
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 51.3
148% 51.9 GB/s
SC Read 48
SC Write 53.1
SC Mixed 46.8
141% 49.3 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 144%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7232 Odyssey G70B
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback