Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8399
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171102
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '24 at 04:06
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 98
2-Core 195
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 657
63% 520 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 8424) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 21.8
13% 21.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 25.2
19% 22.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFME0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 541 288 284 284 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 942
Write 1,160
Mixed 1,028
SusWrite 460
202% 898 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 36
121% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 290
214% 282 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 283%
JMicron 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0223
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 133 132 127 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 313
Write 122
Mixed 194
SusWrite 132
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 16.8
56% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 66.1
DQ Write 53.9
DQ Mixed 61.1
46% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 62%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
415GB free
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 422 323 214 104 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 290
Write 105
Mixed 102
SusWrite 307
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 17.1
62% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 37.8
DQ Mixed 35.7
27% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 102%
Spcc Sol id State Disk 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 35 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.2% Very poor
Read 53.6
Write 37.4
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 37.1
9% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 8.2
32% 9.07 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
339GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 136 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 164
Write 158
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 135
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 63 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48% Average
Read 105
Write 53.1
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 62.1
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 27.2
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 6 60 27" 1920 1057 BNQ7F14 BenQ XL2720T
Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback