Today's hottest deals

NEC PC-VJT25GV74563

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemNEC PC-VJT25GV74563  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC V-VG182
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '24 at 09:31
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 172
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 249
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 60B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2128
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JUMPER 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEA2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 161 168 169 296 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
Read 286
Write 137
Mixed 137
SusWrite 211
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 12.1
53% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 30
23% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 13.3" 1280 720 LGD0548
Typical PC-VJT25GV74563 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: NEC PC-VJT25GV74563

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback