Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230712
Uptime25 Days
Run DateJul 13 '24 at 23:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 35.9
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 99.6
33% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 142
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.8
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JUMPER 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0411A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 321 318 44 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
Read 400
Write 335
Mixed 342
SusWrite 175
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 12
77% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 72.5
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 30.3
44% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB
4 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 22 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0AFC
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback