Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 285%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 379%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive575% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory82.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240116
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 05:50
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900-$490
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 219
2-Core 440
125% 245 Pts
4-Core 884
8-Core 1,740
155% 1,312 Pts
64-Core 3,889
241% 3,889 Pts
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$749
Asus(1043 88DD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 350
Parallax 378
292% 362 fps
MRender 502
Gravity 305
Splatting 219
265% 342 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 247%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$195
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4184 4175 4140 4330 2554 1413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
575% Outstanding
Read 4,129
Write 4,177
Mixed 2,887
SusWrite 3,466
824% 3,665 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 102
368% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 2,160
DQ Write 1,682
DQ Mixed 1,885
1,420% 1,909 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 575%
Great: 564%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
762GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2480 2486 2487 1591 1389 1381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
429% Outstanding
Read 2,643
Write 2488
Mixed 1,953
SusWrite 1969
509% 2,263 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 106
360% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 2,295
DQ Write 1,809
DQ Mixed 2,001
1,511% 2,035 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 429%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
95GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,642
Write 2,486
Mixed 1,937
524% 2,355 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 106
360% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 2,276
DQ Write 1800
DQ Mixed 1,984
1,499% 2,020 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$320
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 490 490 490 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 484
Mixed 449
SusWrite 490
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67.8
226% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$320
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 490 490 490 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 475
Mixed 450
SusWrite 490
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67.8
227% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%
JMicron 4TB
155GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 401 402 390 403 402 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 403
Write 408
Mixed 378
SusWrite 402
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 30.7
99% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 155
114% 149 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK64GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK64GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 95GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 25.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 31.5" 1280 720 DEL427B DELL U3223QE
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $910
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback