Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 377%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive409% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X  (all builds)
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 21:42
Run Duration430 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$546
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 215
2-Core 448
127% 248 Pts
4-Core 862
8-Core 1,665
150% 1,264 Pts
64-Core 3,801
235% 3,801 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,735
Asus(1043 88E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 560.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (357 fps cap detected)
247% Outstanding
Lighting 357
Reflection 357
Parallax 357
291% 357 fps
MRender 357
Gravity 357
Splatting 289
269% 334 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 247%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPE21D960GA 960GB
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010650
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1804 1796 1805 1806 1815 1815 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
409% Outstanding
Read 2,185
Write 1,818
Mixed 1961
SusWrite 1,807
437% 1,943 MB/s
4K Read 159
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 129
466% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,712
DQ Write 1,345
DQ Mixed 1,502
1,131% 1,520 MB/s
Poor: 304%
This bench: 409%
Great: 597%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 235 212 170 178 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,848
Write 3,910
Mixed 2,406
SusWrite 309
480% 2,118 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 69.6
234% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,834
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 1,595
1,109% 1,412 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 224%
Great: 574%
Crucial T705 M.2 4TB-$520
1TB free
Firmware: PACR5111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5730 5434 1515 1623 1256 1185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
549% Outstanding
Read 5,861
Write 6,256
Mixed 3636
SusWrite 2,791
1,039% 4,636 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 85.1
272% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,891
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 1,633
1,130% 1,434 MB/s
Poor: 492%
This bench: 549%
Great: 994%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
712GB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3419 2093 2082 2105 2138 2143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 3071
Write 3,805
Mixed 3,196
SusWrite 2,330
700% 3,100 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 89.7
301% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,953
DQ Write 1,460
DQ Mixed 1,670
1,259% 1,695 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 434%
Great: 587%
Nextorage NE1N4TB 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: EIFS31.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4035 4105 4109 4111 4116 4281 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
503% Outstanding
Read 2,427
Write 3,643
Mixed 3,052
SusWrite 4,126
753% 3,312 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 81.6
264% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 2,025
DQ Write 1,212
DQ Mixed 1,736
1,261% 1,658 MB/s
Poor: 243%
This bench: 503%
Great: 642%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-7200J3646F24G 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
270% Outstanding
MC Read 169
MC Write 64
MC Mixed 85.4
303% 106 GB/s
SC Read 44.4
SC Write 68
SC Mixed 58.8
163% 57.1 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 270%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 44.8" 2293 889 GSM9E8C LG ULTRAGEAR+
Typical GA-X670E AORUS PRO X Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $2,203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback