Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20TLCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20TLCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20TLCTO1WW
Memory2.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240321
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '24 at 03:27
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 17.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 192
54% 109 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 688
67% 548 Pts
64-Core 779
48% 779 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Legend(17AA 22C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 538.18
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.4% Below average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 46.4
40% 50.3 fps
MRender 51.9
Gravity 46
Splatting 45.5
39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 43%
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22C0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 8
Parallax 6.8
4% 6.6 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg6aznv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5108AGLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 216 239 261 227 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 757
Write 316
Mixed 384
SusWrite 237
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 24.5
79% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 301
200% 243 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 257%
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 2TB
809GB free
Firmware: 4060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 215 238 260 226 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 387
Write 216
Mixed 304
SusWrite 236
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 17
74% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 75.9
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 151
97% 110 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 5.1
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 418 114 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C6A LG FHD
Typical 20TLCTO1WW Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20TLCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback