Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 386%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 517%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics371% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive428% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory102.7 GB free of 192 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230721
Uptime19.9 Days
Run DateAug 12 '24 at 23:37
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$449
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 66.9
1-Core 203
2-Core 407
114% 226 Pts
4-Core 803
8-Core 1,534
139% 1,169 Pts
64-Core 3,634
225% 3,634 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
371% Outstanding
Lighting 581
Reflection 568
Parallax 678
474% 609 fps
MRender 527
Gravity 573
Splatting 311
369% 470 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 371%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$120
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3346 3006 1645 1662 1657 1661 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
428% Outstanding
Read 2,879
Write 3,460
Mixed 3,112
SusWrite 2,163
656% 2,904 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 112
370% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,669
DQ Write 1,260
DQ Mixed 1,432
1,080% 1,454 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 428%
Great: 508%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$120
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3390 3400 3409 3406 3413 3399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
509% Outstanding
Read 2,813
Write 3,484
Mixed 3,111
SusWrite 3,403
726% 3,203 MB/s
4K Read 77.1
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 114
379% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,788
DQ Write 1,379
DQ Mixed 1,542
1,165% 1,570 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 509%
Great: 508%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$170
866GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 522
Write 496
Mixed 465
110% 495 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 70.5
235% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 522
Write 498
Mixed 464
110% 495 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 70.7
236% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 372
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
WDC WD60EZAX-22C8VB0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 206
Write 134
Mixed 137
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 0.9
43% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 6.1
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 2.5
4% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 38%
WDC WD60EZAX-22C8VB0 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 186
Write 139
Mixed 170
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 1.4
71% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 4.6
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 2.5
4% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 38%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1153
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.7
Write 116
Mixed 76.5
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 67%
NORELSYS 1081CS0 32GB
19GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.1
Write 11
Mixed 12
32% 37 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK192GX5M4B5200C38 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
206% Outstanding
MC Read 136
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 56.1
228% 79.9 GB/s
SC Read 42.9
SC Write 58.2
SC Mixed 47.9
142% 49.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 206%
Great: 206%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1920 1057 DEL4278 DELL U2723QE
Typical GA-X670E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback