Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful A320M-K PRO
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '24 at 09:18
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 172
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 416
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.1% Good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 119
Parallax 77.2
66% 92.3 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 68.7
67% 83.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Itech 512GB 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP2B03A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 370 350 422 417 422 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.5% Very good
Read 484
Write 434
Mixed 291
SusWrite 386
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 5.8
73% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 6.7
63% 142 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
798GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 108 108 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66% Good
Read 121
Write 126
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 110
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN Adata 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 24.3
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 18.9
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 21.5" 1280 720 DELA097 DELL P2214H
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback