Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '24 at 22:51
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$130
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 340
105% 198 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 998
104% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2414) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 427
80% 195 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 248
Splatting 286
176% 203 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 110%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 426
Mixed 237
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 44.7
151% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 256
208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 116%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$69
291GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.9
Write 80.2
Mixed 60.3
60% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.1
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 29 206 57 165 34" 1280 720 IVM7624 PL3467WQ
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback