Today's hottest deals

Pcspecialist Ionico Iii 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist Ionico Iii 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7AGxP
Memory50.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220623
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateSep 08 '24 at 15:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 260
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 512
57% 447 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1176) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3887
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2TB PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 2TB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1.0.1S Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 652 409 70 99 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 793
Write 629
Mixed 589
SusWrite 337
131% 587 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 43.1
151% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 159
174% 301 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMS5X32G2A48C40A2-PC 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 52.5
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 26
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 127%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 240 17.2" 1280 720 BOE0A8F
Typical Ionico Iii 17 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Ionico Iii 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 152% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback