Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive595% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE76 12UE
MotherboardMSI MS-17K4  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '24 at 20:41
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 204
2-Core 403
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 739
8-Core 1,271
122% 1,005 Pts
64-Core 2,023
125% 2,023 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 1324) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 31.7
22% 29.9 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 1
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00-1102 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3718 4003 3999 3914 3921 3872 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
595% Outstanding
Read 3,928
Write 3,922
Mixed 2,794
SusWrite 3,904
819% 3,637 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 284
4K Mixed 99.4
385% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 2,144
DQ Write 1,543
DQ Mixed 1,868
1,389% 1,852 MB/s
Poor: 313%
This bench: 595%
Great: 595%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G56C46S5.C16D 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
146% Outstanding
MC Read 57.8
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 57.5
162% 56.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 31.2
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 146%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE09A4
Typical MS-17K4 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback