Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA401WV
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '24 at 21:56
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 HX 370
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 64.6
1-Core 210
2-Core 350
109% 208 Pts
4-Core 707
8-Core 1,363
123% 1,035 Pts
64-Core 2,387
148% 2,387 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 890M
Asus(1043 3798) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.18.08
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.8% Good
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 117
61% 77.6 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 98
64% 74 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00-1102 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2005 1905 1862 1924 1913 1919 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,727
Write 2,002
Mixed 1,911
SusWrite 1,921
480% 2,140 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 60.4
209% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 593
413% 529 MB/s
Poor: 313%
This bench: 313%
Great: 595%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
MC Read 79.2
MC Write 71
MC Mixed 66
206% 72.1 GB/s
SC Read 46.3
SC Write 93.8
SC Mixed 63.6
194% 67.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 197%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 203 55 165 14" 1280 720 BOE0CA4 NE140QDM-NX7
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback