HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2336
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170412
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 01:29
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 147
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 214
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2336) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.87
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.38
4% 5.75 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 9.65
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 392
Write 390
Mixed 364
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 9.25
45% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 47
70% 133 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 99%
USBDev Pendrive 8GB
5GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.34
Mixed 4.75
8% 7.93 MB/s
4K Read 0.01
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.003
0% 0.006 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $158Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback