Today's hottest deals

AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230215
Uptime21.5 Days
Run DateOct 04 '24 at 00:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 159
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 419
46% 361 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 16.9
10% 15.6 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 14.8
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 152 40 47 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 1,379
Write 153
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 59.7
86% 407 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 5.3
88% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 55.8
DQ Mixed 101
113% 204 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 342%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 2R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 15% 74 142 56 60 20.7" 1280 720 HPN348C HP V214a
Typical SER Builds (Compare 817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback