Today's hottest deals

One-netbook ONEXPLAYER X1 A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive519% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemOne-netbook ONEXPLAYER X1 A  (all builds)
MotherboardONE-NETBOOK ONEXPLAYER X1 A
Memory44.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '24 at 17:56
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 57.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
78% 148 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 882
84% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,107
68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
Gigabyte(1458 403D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 272
Parallax 312
253% 298 fps
MRender 330
Gravity 252
Splatting 184
201% 255 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 208%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer N7000 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN15536
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3542 3383 3570 3744 3767 3751 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
519% Outstanding
Read 3,856
Write 3,971
Mixed 3,374
SusWrite 3,626
836% 3,707 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 89.8
277% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,444
DQ Write 1,095
DQ Mixed 890
768% 1,143 MB/s
Poor: 428%
This bench: 519%
Great: 519%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 67.5
MC Mixed 47.9
160% 56 GB/s
SC Read 41.5
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 50.5
133% 46.7 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 151%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 48.8" 1280 720 SAM7052 LC49G95T
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback