bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 07:24
Run Duration586 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
CPU #000, 24 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 173
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 709
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,630
101% 1,630 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 105GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
Read 374
Write 372
Mixed 380
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 11.8
44% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 51.2
63% 111 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 30.4
Mixed 11.9
29% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.46
71% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 43%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 29.7
Mixed 12
29% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.46
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 43%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 16TB
427GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 108%
WDC WD10 EACS-65D6B0 1TB
33GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.5% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 29.1
Mixed 8.83
27% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.28
77% 0.91 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 42
131% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 113%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback