Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '16 at 20:53
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 97.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 688
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
MSI(1462 3250) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 123
Parallax 109
98% 117 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 107
Splatting 94.4
82% 100 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
174GB free
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 493
Write 226
Mixed 227
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 15.2
142% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 14.4
72% 167 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 91%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 394GB
112GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,338
Write 126
Mixed 226
120% 563 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 15.8
92% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 78.1
122% 246 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 148%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 86GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 1,328
Write 115
Mixed 214
117% 552 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 10.8
84% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 408
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 10.6
72% 176 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 130%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
9GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 128
Write 43.5
Mixed 50.4
78% 74 MB/s
4K Read 5.86
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.93
100% 2.72 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL10 8GB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 29.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 47
85% 47 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback