Omron NY-Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOmron NY-Series  (all builds)
Motherboardcongatec TS175
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '18 at 12:47
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1515M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 578
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 573
35% 573 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 19.4
15% 17.3 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 28.2
17% 19.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3ME3 512GB
454GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S17411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 309
Write 215
Mixed 242
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 1.6
40% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 1.58
21% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
0GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 42.1
Write 42.2
Mixed 29
47% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.88
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 3.66
500% 7.53 MB/s
DQ Read 9.65
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 4.88
573% 8.48 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown i-DIMM 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 56.3
MC Mixed 26
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 19.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 113%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback