HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8330
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-9000e APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 51.1
34% 49 Pts
4-Core 50.8
8-Core 51.6
7% 51.2 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 8330) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 4
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3ME3 512GB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S16425
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 118 148 157 149 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 293
Write 173
Mixed 163
SusWrite 148
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 2.6
21% 7.57 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 19.4
19% 30 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback