HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140422
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '18 at 20:38
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 397
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 04A7) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 2.09
2% 2.24 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.87
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP36 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 163
Mixed 135
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.36
104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab2d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 19.1
Mixed 4.12
19% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 3.05
4K Mixed 0.47
124% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 54%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
751GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 19.6
Mixed 18.5
27% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.22
23% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-013.A00LF Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback