Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140214
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 14:21
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 182 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 537 55% 445 Pts	64-Core 665 41% 665 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 32 Parallax 39 38% 39.2 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 42.4 Splatting 37.2 32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 2,076 Write 1,153 Mixed 1,397 340% 1,542 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 31.5 111% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 72.6 79% 134 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 210%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 148GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29768 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1157 (B1) Unknown 1 1 1295 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 49 22 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 96 96 3537 (EB) Unknown 99 99 375 (F1) Unknown 99 99 83657199343	67.4% Good	Read 459 Write 335 Mixed 340 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 16.5 72% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 59.8 71% 127 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 118%
H/W RAID5 16TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 5TB free Firmware: 0957 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	71% Very good	Read 138 Write 110 Mixed 75.8 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.22 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.12 75% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 127%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 373GB free Firmware: 1AN10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 732 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 61 49 11988 (04) Start/Stop count 72 72 29221 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 38352 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2631 (BF) G-sense error rate 93 93 77761 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 176094314521 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1605 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 77 77 236635	48.3% Average	Read 69.1 Write 98.9 Mixed 60.6 57% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.43 106% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M4X160 Kingston 9905403-011.A CMZ8GX3M4X160 Kingston 9905403-011.A CMZ8GX3M4X160 Kingston 99U5471-002.A CMZ8GX3M4X160 Kingston 99U5471-002.A 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.8% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 28.8 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	32x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	32x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	8x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $129Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 71%, 602 samples	5x
CMX4GX3M1A160 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ CMX8GX3M2A160 Kingston KHX1600C10D3L 24GBCorsairBench 45%, 9 samples	5x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 84 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,471

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16