Asus K73SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus K73SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K73SJ
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 22:25
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 89.7
50% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 148
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1682) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.04 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Pyro SE 60GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 604A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 365
Write 48.9
Mixed 90.7
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 10.1
64% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 96.1
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 27.9
33% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 66%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
39GB free
Firmware: JEDO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 58.3
Mixed 63.2
45% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K73SJ Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K73SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback