Today's hottest deals

HP Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221B
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 15:18
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2961Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 103
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 56.8
48% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 62.2
8-Core 48.5
8% 55.3 Pts
64-Core 48.7
3% 48.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 221B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3740
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.38
2% 2.45 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.31 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV128MAZ-1AE1ZABHA 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M104
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 428
Write 169
Mixed 208
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 15.4
56% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 25.4
29% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 10
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 8.24
485% 8.24 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback