Today's hottest deals

HP Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221B
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '18 at 14:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2961Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 14.5
2-Core 18.5
34% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 33.1
8-Core 43.6
5% 38.3 Pts
64-Core 22.5
1% 22.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 221B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 2.34
1% 2.18 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV128MAZ-1AE1ZABHA 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M104
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 427
Write 171
Mixed 194
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 20.4
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 40.8
44% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x2 612 G1 Tablet

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback