Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '18 at 13:22
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 97.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 237 87% 152 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 475 64% 476 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 354.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 10.8 12% 13.5 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 15.7 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256S1C 256GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1345 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 234 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 61 (A3) Unknown 100 100 29 (A4) Unknown 100 100 100484 (A5) Unknown 100 100 143 (A6) Unknown 100 100 41 (A7) Unknown 100 100 97 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 97 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 410 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 507239 (F2) Unknown 100 100 259729 (F5) Unknown 100 100 803872	81.5% Excellent	Read 499 Write 372 Mixed 484 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 22.7 106% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 21.3 59% 116 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 111%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 32GB free Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 85 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 231 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 11 (AE) Unknown 100 100 24 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 76 53 201864445976 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2862493211 (F7) Unknown 100 100 90058699 (F8) Unknown 100 100 73015200 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1259 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	70.4% Very good	Read 477 Write 339 Mixed 336 85% 384 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 20.2 84% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 37.9 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 40.1 53% 90.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 33GB free Firmware: CC1G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 74155652 (03) Spinup time 100 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2994 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 180466274 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 24787 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1303 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 1690 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 538181664 (C2) HDA temperature 32 51 60129542176 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 27 24 74155652 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 94742683604404 (F1) Unknown 100 253 76969671 (F2) Unknown 100 253 466783677	34.6% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 60.7 Mixed 62.4 46% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GB 993 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 26.7 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 23.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 46.9 85% 46.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	337x
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	219x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	181x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	25x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	21x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369