Today's hottest deals

Asrock 880GM-LE FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 880GM-LE FX  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 18:18
Run Duration460 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 124
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 155
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20.2
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 252GB
200GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 6% Great: 8%
Richdisk device 54GB
41GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 62.3
Write 35.8
Mixed 43.1
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.29
4K Write 4.82
4K Mixed 3.68
719% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29%
Great: 34%
Richdisk device 75GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 63.3
Write 35
Mixed 41.6
35% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.91
4K Write 4.38
4K Mixed 3.73
658% 4.01 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%
Richdisk device 247GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 63.4
Write 36.6
Mixed 41.7
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.07
4K Write 4.47
4K Mixed 3.21
651% 4.25 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 29%
Richdisk device 118GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 34.3
Mixed 43.6
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.41
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 3.82
739% 4.68 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%
USB 2.0 Flash 4GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 4.15
Mixed 5.92
8% 7.41 MB/s
4K Read 3.26
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GM-LE FX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback