Today's hottest deals

Asrock 880GM-LE FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 880GM-LE FX  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 19:15
Run Duration400 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 97.2
48% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 144
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.8% Terrible
Lighting 9.67
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 12
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 13
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.8%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 252GB
200GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 6% Great: 8%
Richdisk device 54GB
41GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 47.8
Write 9
Mixed 16.2
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.21
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 1.03
228% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 34%
Richdisk device 75GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 45.3
Write 7.67
Mixed 17.6
18% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.62
4K Write 2.97
4K Mixed 1.53
334% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 29%
Richdisk device 247GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 48.4
Write 25.3
Mixed 27.4
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.54
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 1.54
321% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 29%
Richdisk device 118GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 48.5
Write 13.1
Mixed 25.2
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 2.92
4K Mixed 1.97
414% 2.76 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMB4GB684CA3-13HC 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GM-LE FX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback