HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML310e Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130824
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '18 at 12:31
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 64
2-Core 117
55% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 410
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 80GB
47GB free
Firmware: 6.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
Read 470
Write 88.1
Mixed 110
48% 223 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 10.3
51% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 31.2
48% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 49%
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$120
39GB free
Firmware: E7FT04.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,354
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,564
392% 1,775 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 38.1
126% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 136
156% 265 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 234%
Great: 185%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 60GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.00
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 96%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
457GB free
Firmware: 6.00
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 158
Write 149
Mixed 132
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.25
93% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 647658-081 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML310e Gen8 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback